“We Have No Reason to Believe 5G is Safe”


The technology is coming, but contrary to what some people say, there could be health risks.

The telecommunications industry and their experts have accused many scientists who have researched the effects of cell phone radiation of “fear mongering” over the advent of wireless technology’s 5G. Since much of our research is publicly-funded, we believe it is our ethical responsibility to inform the public about what the peer-reviewed scientific literature tells us about the health risks from wireless radiation.


One thought on ““We Have No Reason to Believe 5G is Safe”

  1. Solomon says:

    The chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) recently announced through a  press release  that the commission will soon reaffirm the radio frequency radiation (RFR) exposure limits that the FCC adopted in the late 19. These limits are based upon a  behavioral change in rats  exposed to microwave radiation and were designed to protect us from  short-term heating risks due to RFR exposure.   Yet, since the FCC adopted these limits based largely on research from the 19, the preponderance of peer-reviewed research,  more than 500 studies, have found harmful biologic or health effects from exposure to RFR at intensities too low to cause significant heating.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.